Band Members' Individual Blog Pages and other great links:

Monday, September 5, 2011

The Constitution

This is an older piece - daughter is in her 20's now and I can't call her "short stuff" anymore - but it seems right to revisit it considering current events. Hope you enjoy and comment!



The Constitution

by
James Scotte Burns II




"Dad, why don't you be president?"
It certainly seemed an innocent enough question from a ten year old, and well within the bounds of the political discussion then in progress. Yet, as I considered the option later, the answer became much more involved than the initial response I supplied. Not more appealing, just involved. My daughter seemed satisfied as I declined her nomination for president, explaining that I could not abide those humor-challenged Armani drones following us around for the rest of our lives, peering at us through their Ray Charles disguises. Secret Service guys are rarely adept at playing four-square or pushing a swing without getting a bunch of wires tangled around their brief cases. Besides, we know how Mom gets when denied quiet nights at home, and the White House is known to harbor unkempt guests from god-knows-where nearly every night. I love what remains of my country, but household harmony comes first.

Still, as I lay awake on the sofa that night, watching Star Trek reruns as if something unexpected might happen, I pondered why fellows like me or Carter Braxton, (one of the ten Founding Farmers signing the Declaration of Independence), no longer vie for high office. Something seemed fundamentally screwed up. How can a nation founded on the noble principle of a representative government of citizens serving their country and then going back home to grow tobacco, deteriorate into the current comic fiefdom displayed on what passes for the news these days? A nation ruled by a permanent cabal of Alpha-lawyers and philandering bluebloods intent on regulating and bureaucratizing every facet of the society whose industry provides them the lofty perch on which they park their adipose butts? This sobering contemporary scenario left me with two obvious questions. What the hell happened to us, and what if anything, could I do about it if I were president?

First thing's first. What the hell did happen to us? What brought this great nation to its hands and knees and made it whimper its insecurity like some cowering, baby-powdered toy poodle pissing on itself in the back of a perfume stained Mary Kay Cadillac? There is no single causal factor involved in this lycanthropic conversion and the change happened over several decades.

It probably began with the ratification of the sixteenth Amendment in 1913. This is the act allowing government to confiscate a percentage of people's earnings before they had even seen the money. The self-righteous bastards followed this in 1919 by outlawing liquor, thinking that if the citizenry bit on that income tax thing, they were probably stoned out of their proletariat gourds. We straightened up only long enough to figure out that females ought to be able to vote, since they were helping to pay for everything (Amendment 19). Next, we invented talking movies, assuming that Hollywood always had important things to say, flushed most of our personal resources down the sewers of New York, made a New Deal with what remained of our unconfiscated wealth, and then decided it was time to start drinking again.

Following on the heels of these little morsels of history, we fought against world totalitarian domination; something at which we were really quite good. Then we formed the United Nations, so that everyone else in the world could share in the bounty of that sixteenth Amendment thing. Somewhere in there we learned how to incinerate vast areas of hostile territory using little more than a big uranium-rich Heathkit. Americans accomplished much of this under the popular and fatherly reign of the most propaganda-dependent president of the century. Then we passed the 22nd Amendment limiting presidential terms, even if we really like the guy. Go figure.

Since then, we have fought all over the world but only had one more war. We've had one president felled by criminals and one who was a criminal. (Maybe two, but we weren't interested, since it had already been done) One president lost an election because of uncertainty regarding what his lips had done. One of our more recent leaders even did a respectable job but people became dissatisfied with him because their TV's whispered to them that he was only letting them keep their money so that poor people couldn't have it!

We launched a "women's movement" that required ladies to take off their brassieres and then run about screaming that guys were gawking at their breasts. A "peace movement" appeared, responsible for more riots than general admission Who concerts. A "worker's movement" erupted, wherein people went on strike, which is like...not working. Various other political movements further ensured that nothing political ever moved. As fewer of us could agree on what we thought about all this, let alone what to do about it, a seemingly endless parade of beatniks, hippies, yuppies, puppies, rappers, rapists, rock stars, victims, leaders, pundits, junkies, prophets, pedophiles, anchormen, beauty queens, born-agains and bums clambered over one another for our attention and our approval. Those Americans remaining sane through all this were sufficiently distracted that we scarcely noticed as the barbarians at our gates matured. They then mated with the sanctimonious intellectuals and fundamentalist blowhards that we never invite to parties. This unholy union produced the contemporary breed of bureaucrat/legislator/judges who now rifle through our pockets with such regularity, it hardly tickles anymore.
Now we find ourselves in a country in which we win a battle with the Edu-crats over school policy, only to find that the Legi-crats are stealing our land. We turn back an assault by the Socio-crats on our rights to self-defense while the Busni-crats throttle domestic commerce. All the while, efforts to turn back the tide of erosion against our freedoms are undermined by the timid and ignorant trading their votes and rights for more government "security" while the long arm of the law becomes just one big manicured finger.

Considering the enormity and complexity of the problem, I have concluded that a president can do nothing to return us to the ideals generated by our forebears. Therefore, I do not want the job, thank you. However, I would submit that the collective power of the people, manifest in our framing document, The Constitution, retains the power necessary to stem the tide and ignite an American Renaissance. To be effective, however, two things would have to happen.

First, politicians, judges and anyone else subject to oath-taking on the Constitution would have to hold the highest regard for the sanctity of their covenant. Treating transgressions of their oaths as acts of treason punishable by public execution might be an effective incentive here. If carried on local PBS channels during pledge drives, public broadcasting would be flush for decades.

Second, a clarification needs to commence, wherein we could repeal superfluous, inane, outdated or destructive additions to the original document, reforming obsolete or obscure language in order to make the intent and effect of the whole understandable for the next century. Since this is my idea, and I turned down the whole president thing, allow me the opportunity to suggest how this redefinition might unfold. I am doing this with my kids in mind, so you can trust me. Here we go.

We, the People of the United States, in Order to form a union which makes more sense than the oozing mess we've made in the last half-century, re-establish justice, aspire to domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the GENERAL Welfare, but not your individual welfare, since that's your job, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and everybody else after we are dead, do put into effect and recognize as law this Constitution of the United States of America. And we really mean it this time.

Articles I-VII, all sections:
Having read through the original articles of the Constitution, finding them to be both wise and wholly ignored by the politipaths we have let slobber on them for their own benefit in the past, all articles are to be considered Federal Law and enforced as such. An addition to Article II, somewhere between sections 3 and 4 shall establish as unlawful the act of Executive Order. All such previous orders will become available to the people, on display in the Library of Congress. Figuring out how to implement the forgotten articles and dispersing the riots following the release of the aforementioned Executive Orders will fall to the House of Representatives. This should build some character in the bastards.

Amendment One:
Congress will make no law telling people what to believe, who God is, what God wants or behave in any way that restricts people thinking about it for themselves. Congress may not restrict what people say, no matter how stupid or ignorant it may be, or what the press can say about it, even if they are wrong. Citizens may visit with anyone they wish, in any number, so long as they do not make a mess or start a fight. If they all want to tell Congress to go suck an egg, well, that's just fine.

Amendment Two:
Since the world is full of bullies, some of whom have guns, and the government is not above falling into this category, American citizens have right to own and carry guns if they like. If anyone goes and does something stupid with one though, other citizens have the right to shoot them with their gun and give it someone more responsible.

Amendment Three:
As long as the country is not at war, the government may not use private property for military purposes. If one of our soldiers needs a place to stay or a sandwich, he/she can just ask and most folks will oblige. We are all on the same side here.

Amendment Four:
Since your stuff is your stuff and your home your castle, nobody from any government agency can take or look at your things without your permission. The only way we, (hereafter referred to as The People), allow this is if the government has a really good reason that a judge will believe. This must include what the government thinks you are doing, what they want to look for, and where they are going to look for it. In that case, the judge will give them a permission slip that you can see first.

Amendment Five:
No American has to answer to a crime, except when a Grand Jury agrees they're in really big trouble, unless they are in the military, in which case, they should have known better, after all the money we spent training them; nor is anybody going to be tried twice for the same offense or be required to say things which make them look like a criminal, even if it's the truth. No one will be executed, jailed or have their stuff taken away without a fair trial, and if we, (you know, The People), do take anybody's stuff, we have to pay a decent price for it.

Amendment Six:
Any person accused of a crime gets to have a trial as soon as we can pencil it in. Their trial will be public and judged by a jury of people who are not taking the whole thing personally, for one reason or another, and who live right around where the defendant does. The accused person has to be told exactly what we think they did, be able to confront anybody who says they did it, and make those people show up to say so, even if they have other things to do. Other people who might be able to help the accused person have to show up too. Since the whole thing can get a little complicated, he/she can always bring a lawyer, if they want. Heck, we'll even pay for it, if we have to.

Amendment Seven:
In a case where no law is broken, but you get your panties in a knot over something stupid someone's done costing you more than a hundred bucks, (It used to be twenty, but what with inflation and all...), you can sue them in front of a jury. Nothing that the jury decides can be decided again in another court, except according to the local rules for suing people. Having said rules explained to you for two hundred dollars an hour will give you some idea as to why lawyers have so few friends except for other lawyers.

Amendment Eight:
Bail will not be set so high that only mega-celebrities and other rich guys get to walk before trial. Fines also have to be set at a level where there is a chance of paying them. Further, we don't beat people, realign their anatomy, or do any other weird things to them as punishment for crimes.

Amendment Nine:
Just because we spelled a few things out here as rights, it doesn't mean that we don't allow or don't like anything else reasonable people can do or say that we didn't mention.

Amendment Ten:
Any government power we haven't talked about here, or that we didn't come right out and say States can't do, are reserved to the States, or the People, which, I hope you all remember, is supposed to be the same thing.

All of the above were what the wise guys who started this American thing thought we needed to have to make a go of it, pretty much forever. They are what became known as the Bill of Rights and they worked pretty well on their own for a long time. Although the founders did allow for changes to be made now and then, they made the process such a pain in our collective backside that frivolous or silly things would hopefully be weeded out before mucking things up. In fact, nobody really thought seriously about adding anything until 1794, when the third Congress proposed the Eleventh Amendment, which was a pretty good idea, but got the ball rolling toward the current mess of twenty-seven amendments of which we currently try to make sense. Many of these later additions are merely legislative flotsam which we must bring on board, examine, and either sink forever, or safely bring to shore and show off. Following is a brief summary of these, whether and why we keep them. Again, you can trust me here. I'm a reasonably smart guy who is doing this for his kids, and I wouldn't do anything which is going to make us all look stupid two hundred years from now.

Amendment Eleven:
The Federal judiciary may not go sticking it's big nose into any lawsuits against individual states.
We keep this one. It's hard enough getting legal satisfaction against a state government for the occasional Stupid Government Trick without Uncle Sam throwing a bunch of their stuffed suits into the mix. It really isn't any of their business anyway, unless they are at fault, in which case they can be named in the lawsuit.

Amendment Twelve: Deals with the way we choose the President and Vice-President. The original text is still quite adequate here, even if it isn't very amusing.
Some of this amendment was later altered by the twentieth amendment, which we shall summarily ignore for now, since all it does is complicate the issue of terms when viewed in the context of the original concept of our government, where the President is just an executive and not a shah or the owner of Microsoft, or something really important.

Amendment Thirteen:
No one gets to own anyone else.
Contrary to popular belief, many of our founders were opposed to slavery from the beginning, but yielded on including abolition as one of the original "inclusive amendments" in order to have the Constitution ratified by all thirteen states, some of whose representatives were not as "enlightened" by their times as we have been led to believe. Needless to say, we keep this one and shouldn't have taken so long figuring it out. Thanks, Abe.

Amendment Fourteen:
States cannot restrict rights somebody already has as a U.S. Citizen.
This probably could have gone without saying, but since it is here and makes sense, we'll keep it. However, it also contains subsections worth mentioning separately, as there are a few minor alterations necessary to bring them up to speed.
Section 2- Delete all use of the word "male" preceding "inhabitant" or "citizen" and we probably ought to discuss whether or not Indians are actually taxed and therefore exempt from representation.
Section 4- It would be wise, at this point, to begin to question the validity
of the public debt of the U.S.. Maybe it's just me.

Amendment Fifteen:
All citizens of the U.S. get to vote, regardless of their current or past race or color.
Or anything else, for that matter, so long as they aren't in prison or ignorant. Yes, I know it sounds mean, but we need to pass legislation related to this amendment which would prohibit ignorant people from voting before they at least read a book, or something.

Amendment Sixteen: REPEAL
This amendment allowed the federal government to confiscate ridiculous amounts of money that it did not generate in order to redistribute it to people who did not earn it, who then vote for those that give it away. From now on, the Feds must get by on a ten percent national sales tax, tariffs, fees for federal services and whatever their lawyers and publicists might like to kick in. Donations are always welcome. For those of you screaming "What about the poor" we have transferred about five TRILLION dollars of New Society/Great Deal handouts, which is roughly the same amount as the current national debt, and yet, the percentage of people living in poverty in the U.S. is the same as it was when we started. I don't think that worked very well. While you people are figuring out what the hell to do about it, the rest of us are going to save for our families and I’ll give some of what used to get taken away from me to my Unitarian church, which does a pretty good job of helping the poor. There’s symmetry to it all, somehow.

Amendment Seventeen: REPEAL
Seventeen made the election of senators a function of popular vote. Bad idea. The Senate, being a supposedly more deliberative body, must be informed, subject to reasonable oversight, and be representative of the states and those states' House members. The election of senators is therefore the responsibility of the House. This is also a less expensive method, saving us from having to pay for the privilege of listening to the self-important wretches whine and kvetch at us every election cycle.

Amendment Eighteen: REPEALED
The prohibition of liquor was a perfect example of just how much can go terribly wrong when government gets on a high horse and does something for our own good. Now, don't get me wrong, drinking can lead to a host of personal and societal problems, but then so can stone-cold sober stupidity and I don't believe we can legislate against that with any certainty of compliance either.

Amendment Nineteen:
Girls can vote too.
No one in their right mind would suggest touching this one with a ten-foot flaming brassiere, so be aware of the fact that God wanted ladies to vote, or he'd never have created school boards, independent tickets, and JFK.

Amendment Twenty:
The President and Vice President begin their terms on Jan. 20 and Senators & representatives on Jan. 3.
Originally, I was going to repeal this one, because it seems silly that grownups can't get to work on time without a Constitutional amendment, but if it keeps us from arguing about it, well, I guess we can live with it. The subsections of this amendment deal with the responsibilities of Congress in picking new leaders if the Big Cheeses turn out to be illegal aliens or get their tickets punched to the great White House in the Sky before they've passed the baton, so to speak. Personally, I'd put Larry Miller in charge until the next election, but if we have chosen our representatives well, they should be able to send in a decent second-stringer.

Amendment Twenty-One:
O.K., we must've been stoned, or something. Forget Amendment Eighteen. What? We already did that? Oooh. We forgot. Anybody got a tylenol?
Seriously, we passed an amendment to un-pass another amendment. Couldn't we have just said we were kidding and borrowed an eraser?

Amendment Twenty-Two:
Nobody gets to be Prez for longer than two four-year terms, including if they were only there the first time because the last guy skipped town, and no one gets the Big Chair more than once.
After all, other people might like a turn, too.

Amendment Twenty-Three: REPEAL
Giving the District of Columbia a vote in Presidential elections was a silly idea. It's not like it's a real state, or for that matter, even a real place. Next thing you know, they'll want to give a vote to Hollywood, and then Boulder, and then Martha's Vineyard; God only knows where it will end if we don't stop the madness.

Amendment Twenty-Four:
Everyone who reads a book now and then gets to vote, even if they haven't paid their taxes, including poll taxes, which are dirty pool and therefore shall be left up to the labor unions.
This was a really good idea and keeps the government from blackmailing us for tax money by withholding our most basic right until we ante up.

Amendment Twenty-Five:
If the President can't hack the job for any reason, dies or gets canned, the vice President gets the job, which is why he was hired and is kind of a no-brainer here. The President must keep the veep seat warm with somebody qualified to run things in case the Prez takes a powder. If the President needs to step out for a while, he has to at least send a nice card to Congress and let them know what the hell's going on. If the VP and three quarters of congress determine that the Big Guy (or Gal....it could happen) is a nut, or acts like they've been sniffing Sterno in the Rose Garden, they can move him to a smaller room and run things either until he's better, or until we all pick a new quarterback.
There are lengthy subsections in the original copy of this amendment, but this pretty well sums it up. It is amazing how many words we seem to need to argue over, the later in our history we travel through the amendment process. I think that by 1967, when this little nugget passed, our self-professed Alpha-males of legislation were working by the hour.

Amendment Twenty-Six: REPEAL
Voting privileges are not a function of age, sex, religion, national origin, or even species, for that matter, so long as you are literate and informed on the issues and candidates. Therefore, the only requisite to vote, beyond proof of citizenship, is that you check out a book once in a while at the library where you will no longer have to go to get all those income tax forms.
Limiting voting by age is arbitrary and completely ignores the salient issue underlying why it is so difficult to do a coherent job of electing people and passing initiatives: ignorant people pulling levers for stuff they can't read. Once we get the government out of the education business put that new "off" chip in all the TV's, this problem should become more manageable.

Amendment Twenty-Seven: REPEAL
Allowing a bunch of lawyers to effect their own pay increases under any circumstance is just stupid. From now on, you people up there get forty thousand dollars a year, indexed to inflation, plus expenses, room and board. If the money means that much more to you than the service, then maybe you'd better start sending out some resumes. (Use your own copier, though, and if you need a few stamps, ask that Rostenkowski guy).
Yes, I know the argument that "If you want qualified people, you have to pay them what they can make in the private sector." Horseshit. Many of these folks never had a real job, so how the hell would they know what they could make? Besides, even if things slow down for awhile, I'd rather have a bunch of mechanics, teachers, secretaries, and soldiers serving their country, and then going back to their lives, than a gaggle of self-impressed, overpaid bureaucratic page-turners serving themselves, then retiring on our nickel and thumbing their non-inhaling noses at us. So there.

Now, by this time some of you may have begun to wonder about a few loose ends not covered directly by this Constitution. Items such as state laws, water rights, environmental laws, medical oversight, foreign policy and the like would take a few meetings in order to hammer out the rules. Nevertheless, they don't belong in the framing document and if we can all behave like grownups, we'll work through these a few at a time. I have to go put the kids to bed, but you all are welcome to chew on this for a bit and get back to me. I will have to find a way of telling my little girl that I can't be president, but I think she'll understand when I let her know that I am practicing to be a Founding Father. She trusts me with the Dad thing, and as much as I love my nation, that is a much bigger and more important job to she and God and I. That buck stops here. Good night, honey.

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Ironwood Rain Live! Photos from gigs

a selection of photos of Ironwood Rain in performance...

Ironwood Rain Photos

Ironwood Rain Live
- photos of IR from live performances

IR Photos through the years
- a collection of rare, vintage photos of the illustrious IR members...

IR Photos through the years

Here's some vintage photos of IR members through the years.
Set the wayback machine to... WAAAAY BACK!
See if you recognize these familiar faces from days gone by:


Did you guess right?
Mikey (1969)


Scotte (1983):


JJ:

Apocalypse: The Forever Ending Story (excerpt 3)

All the Time in the World: Varieties of Doom

God's Wrath: The Happy Ending

God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.
- Voltaire

He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife.
- Douglas Adams


Medical advances neuter the most dreadful plagues and afflictions, science provides unimaginable advances, and most of the world aspires to peace, while unparalleled discoveries, greater freedoms, and better standards of living have been on their latest march for nearly two centuries. Amidst all this, what accounts for the apocalyptic cast of mind of so many free and affluent people? The calamitous events that punctuate even the best of times play their roles, of course. Yet, an apocalyptic worldview does not depend on any specific event or scenario. It is instead a wonderfully clever device for dealing with the anxiety and uncertainty of mortality by making at least our collective fate predictable. Other factors include feelings of inadequacy or sinfulness that lead to fears of divine displeasure. As these concerns are generalized and then understood as a supposedly inherent human corruption(9) , they become collective and are incorporated into systems over time. Conditioning by such systems encourages the belief that people cannot be truly happy before death brings them to heaven; by extension, humanity cannot be fulfilled until it collectively passes away.

Thinking about this extinction and naturally looking for pattern and purpose, human beings try to make some sense of the absurdity of mortality, expanding it to cosmic proportions. A fondness for dualism then asserts itself, providing the satisfying good against evil, God versus Antigod notions that make apocalyptic tales so much easier to understand and enjoy. Complicating the issue, however, which is among humanity's most extraordinary talents, the anger and frustration of an apocalyptic ending becomes frightening. So, these feelings are projected through a creator/destroyer God who is infinitely wise, lovingly devoted, and very much larger than us. God then exercises His own anger and frustration, which is understandable, considering how naughty we had already admitted to being. This makes arguing about the whole affair quite pointless, so most folks just go along. The circle complete, there is order established amidst the chaos of existence, meaning within an otherwise unfathomable universe, and a central place for us in a grand divine plan. This is seen by most folks as far superior to a future as poorly understood future fossils in an existential nothingness.(10)

God the Creator in this way becomes the destroyer/redeemer, wiping us from the physical face of creation for our own good. The eighth century BCE poet/philosopher Hesiod, working in this vein, said that man's only hope was to abandon himself completely to divine will. He pictured history as a series of deteriorating dispensations(11), or stages of existence, culminating with unprecedented social calamity and general warfare before humankind was obliterated for its sinfulness and debauchery. God would turn Creation right around and take everyone home because they could not behave properly.

While this scenario might seem a fearful prospect, it is not viewed as such by the apocalyptically-minded for two primary reasons. First, apocalypse provides the aforementioned predictable ending to creation mythology. If there is a known beginning, there must be rising action, climax, and falling action before the story's conclusion. It fits how we understand life, literature, and afterlife. Next, it provides a comforting sense of moral or social justice. Those who have wronged or ridiculed us will be punished at last without our having to personally act against them. This is particularly helpful when the antagonist is really large and powerful, as was the case with the Babylonians, Romans, Catholic Church, and others. It is an expedient point of view - supplying a reason for the state of the world, a just reward for the faithful, a horrible punishment for the wicked, and eternal bliss afterward in a place where neither uncertainty nor Romans need darken the doorstep again.

The comfort of apocalypse is little different today. Only the names have been changed to protect the innocent and point out the guilty. It affirms the need to believe, offers succor to the downtrodden, and promises that those who refuse to obey the rules and confirm the faith will pay the ultimate price for sewing their seeds of doubt. Commies, pagans, and heretics will convert or perish. Better yet, New Agers will get theirs in The End. But wait! They have an End of their own, and it is neither comforting nor pretty. Unless you're a tree.


No Redeeming Value: The New Age of Apocalypse

It's a wonder we don't dissolve in our own bath water.
- Pablo Picasso

"Do you believe in the devil? You know, a supreme evil being dedicated to the temptation, corruption, and destruction of man?"
"I'm not sure that man needs the help."
- Calvin & Hobbes


Because the West has developed into a largely secular society in the sense that we do not believe that God causes lightning or that illness is necessarily a heavenly punishment, many people no longer expect divine apocalyptic visitations or cosmic events heralded by trumpets and the pitter-pat of angelic sandals. Superstitious and obsessive habits of mind persist however, and so we invent various secular apocalypses such as the Y2K/millennia frenzy. These apocalyptic devices not only support our psychological need for neat beginnings and endings, but they do so in a way that satisfies modern sensibilities, such as a computer malady in place of plague, or disaster from space rather than from heaven. In addition to, or despite, various religious concepts of our inevitable and imminent demise, a definitively secular apocalyptic assumption permeates popular media and literature. Consider the numbers of books and articles panting about looming environmental catastrophes including global warming, invasive non-indigenous species, loss of biodiversity, overpopulation, mutating viruses, and myriad other aspects of Gaia's revenge. This tally does not even include those who fear cataclysmic world war or destruction from space, either through some impersonal cosmic rock, or from an advanced troupe of alien step-brothers(12). Interestingly, these secular dooms often share two primary elements.

First, the crisis is at hand and something must be done at once to avert catastrophe.(13) Fortunately, in a secular apocalypse as opposed to the usual divine doomsday, there is generally some desperately expensive but decisively effective sacrifice of our material lives that we can make to avoid destruction.

Second, while the idea of a proactive method of avoiding calamity is hopeful, if the end does occur in one of these godless scenarios, there is not necessarily a redemptive factor; our existence might simply be over, thereby making way for the next evolutionary experiment. There is no eternal reward and no period of divine probation, with God being for all practical purposes as dead as humanity and their harp seal jackets. The whole thing would be quite meaningless. Nietzsche would be gratified if he weren't so dead already himself. This is a departure from the essentially hopeful traditional apocalypse, where humanity is spanked by God and then given a nice lecture and a hug before everlasting bedtime.

Fascination with an imagined global catastrophe is nothing new of course, but the apocalypse as a do-it-yourself project is a fairly recent idea. Following the nuclear destruction of the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima at the end of the Second World War and the ensuing superpower brinkmanship, total existential destruction seemed not only possible but unavoidable. In an odd way, the recent addition of New Age enviro-goddess mythology has reintroduced renewal of spirit into the apocalyptic scenario. Survivors will be forced to listen to Yanni and wear crystal and turquoise accessories, but survival must come at a price.(14) This return to doom's purpose and meaning is not only natural, but was probably inevitable, as again, a proper apocalypse must complete the plot curve while balancing ruin and renewal in order to be truly compelling. The trick with a secular apocalypse is to do this within a framework in which God is either not the agent, does not exist, or is interested in outcomes of the story beyond those concerning human beings.

The New Age apocalypse also has a political element, but this is nothing new. From its origins in early religious literature, apocalypse has repeatedly been engaged to support political causes. Examples of this include not only today's Christian fundamentalism, but also Nazism, communism, and modern-day mysticism. Communism and National Socialism (Nazism), despite their antagonism toward one another, shared core political ideas masquerading as science. For instance, consider the communist idea of the progress of history and the Nazi eugenics program.(15) They each believed that a methodical understanding and even manipulation of the past and future was possible for an elite few. With religious apocalyptic believers, communists and Nazis shared millenarian beliefs in which the world would undergo a climactic conflict, followed by a profound change in the state of human existence and an eventually purified society. Their utopian fantasies in the end brought nothing but catastrophe to the twentieth century, as each party showed themselves to be somewhat less capable than God of handling the whole affair. Although they had claimed prophecy of a sort regarding the eventual positive outcomes of their struggles, as it turned out they were only struggling with reality, which then came crashing down around them. Still, they did manage to establish the secular apocalypse as a workable entity.

Engulfed by the subsequent secular apocalyptic wave, Christian eschatology largely assumed the role of folklore in modern society, its symbology mingled with contemporary terminology and experience. The result has been a period of pseudo-religious speculation about the end of the world without the assured comfort gained from edifying religious texts. As we will see, the missing information is often filled in using dubious science rather than questionable theology, usually at the expense of attention to genuine threats, the understanding of which calls for deeper thought and careful observation. Since some things never change, what sometimes passes for scientific truth with overly enthusiastic secularists is unfortunately not examined any more closely than the religious assumptions of the sacred past. Those who quiver in anticipation of today's new predictions of doom therefore seldom understand that the science behind their assumptions is not static, and is even sometimes just plain wrong.


(9) A succinct example of this point of view from philosopher Thomas Hobbes states that "...in the first place, I put for a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetual and restless desire of power after power that ceaseth only in death". Hobbes reached this conclusion by hanging out with politicians and aristocrats who by definition would aspire to this end; a self-fulfilling divination if ever there was one. Had he spent more of his adult life with common folk, he would have realized that the "general inclination of all mankind" is a decent sex life, good food, pleasant company, and a nice place to live. That’s why beer commercials look the way they do.

(10) Recent studies suggest that birth trauma can also create a predisposition to apocalyptic thinking. "At birth, the safety and warmth of our womb-world ends and we're forced painfully through a narrow passage into a colder, crueler world." (Finney, 1999.) Death being the next great passage, the pain of our earlier birth experience can therefore elicit great fear and apprehension. Tales of blissful afterlife and punishment of those who didn't behave themselves according to the rules are designed to assuage these feelings. So is red wine, making it a natural ritual accoutrement.

(11) These dispensations were symbolized by a golden age, followed by silver, brass, and iron stages leading up to the end of all things. This metallic symbolism would be copied later by the writer of the Book of Daniel. The idea of dispensations of human existence would also be adopted by apocalyptic worrywart Joachim of Fiore (see chronology.) Dispensationalism would eventually become a central tenet of modern apocalyptic theology.

(12) These scenarios are often used in concert. For instance, overpopulation and rainforest deforestation result in an exotic and deadly plague that is no longer curable because of the loss through pollution and overdevelopment of the very plant species whose byproducts might have saved us. Of course, it could just as well be that a threat from space, such as a comet on collision course, could bind the world together in mutual self-defense. It is also equally possible that some nabob would simply convince everyone that comets are God's will, so why bother saving ourselves?

(13) For many, that something means simply attaching environmentally-friendly bumper stickers to one's Volvo and donating money to the Sierra Club.

(14) It should be noted how distasteful New Agers and Christian fundamentalists find one another's points of view regarding the End of the World and its purpose. Some Christians actually use the rise in New Age belief as further evidence for their own End Times scenario, while New Agers often see Christian fundamentalism as a hindrance to the ascension of human consciousness.

(15) Among the more bizarre Nazi beliefs was the notion that they were the Aryan descendants of the Nephilim, giants of the Old Testament. The Nazi breeding program was designed to recapture and purify the Nephilim genes, resulting in a race of new Aryan "supermen" who would then use their mythical powers to assume control of the world and rid it of bastardizing racial influences. Nazi scientists therefore organized a breeding program to produce this perfect Aryan race. They based their criteria for the perfect human specimen on such important characteristics as skull size. Two things stand out regarding the irrelevance of this technique. In the first place, the Aryans likely originated in Persia, and would have been a bit swarthy for Nazi tastes. Also, cranial size has nothing to do with intellectual capacity, as even a cursory inspection of Mike Tyson strongly suggests.

Monday, April 11, 2011

The band is cooking now...

I had the honor of participating in an Internet Radio Show called Backstage Gourment. PJ Grimes hosts the show which features musicians sharing their favorite recipes. So we spent some time talking about music and then divulged some of my family's secrets for great beans, tortillas and salsa.

The show originally aired on 1-24-11 and can be found on this page:

http://www.healthylife.net/RadioShow/archiveBSG.htm

Try the recipes and share with us your results!


HOMEMADE FLOUR TORTILLAS

4 CUPS FLOUR

1 TBSP BAKING POWDER

1½ TSP SALT

2 TBSP COOKING OIL

APPROXIMATELY 8 OZ COLD WATER

MIX ALL INGREDIENTS TOGETHER. WHEN IT IS MIXED WELL, AND THE CONSISTENCY OF A NON- STICKY DOUGH (ADD FLOUR AS NESSESARY TO GET THE RIGHT CONSISTENCY), MAKE INTO ABOUT 20 OZ BALLS OF DOUGH. PUT A KITCHEN TOWEL IN THE BOWL ANDSPACE THE DOUGHBALLS IN THE BOWL.-SPACE THEM SO THEY DONT TOUCH. COVER WITH ANOTHER KITCHEN TOWEL AND LET SIT FOR APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES BEFORE ROLING FLAT. -BEFORE YOU START MAKING THE BALLS INTO TORTILLAS, KNEAD THEM IN YOUR HANDS-

PAN SHOULD INITIALLY BE VERY HOT. COOK ON MEDIUM/HIGH HEAT ON A FLAT SKILLET OR GRIDDLE.TORTILLAS COOK VER QUICKLY (½- 1 MINUTE FOR EACH SIDE).USUALL WHEN TH E TOP SIDE IS FULL OF SMALL, RAISED BUBBLES, IT'S READYTO BE FLIPPED.

WITH PRACTICE, YOU CAN LEARN HOW TO MAKE ROUND TORTILLAS. UNTIL THEN, CONSIDER IT A LESSON IN GEOGRAPHY-------AS YOU WILL PROBABLY HAVE SHAPES THAT LOOK LIKE PLACES ON A MAP!!-------



HOMEMADE SALSA

1 CAN TOMATOES (WHOLE OR DICED)

APPROX 1 TBSP GARLIC POWDER

1 TSP LEMON JUICE

1 JALAPENO, MINCED

½ CUP ONION, FINELY CHOPPED

SALT AND PEPPER

MIX IN BLENDER. USE PULSE MODE FOR A CHUNKY STYLE OR CONTINUOUS BLENDING FOR A SMOOTHER TEXTURE. EACH INGREDIENT SHOULD BE ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO PERSONAL TASTES. FRESH CILANTRO OR CHILI POWDER MAY ALSO BE ADDED FOR A VARIATION.



PINTO BEANS

4 CUPS DRY PINTO BEANS

3 CLOVES GARLIC, MINCED

1TBSP COOKING OIL

1½ TSP SALT

CLEAN THE BEANS FIRST BY GOING THROUGH THEM THOROUGHLY AND GETTING OUT ANY DIRT OR WRINKLED BEANS. RINSE THOROUGHLY. DON'T THROW AWAY BROKEN BEANS AS THEY HELP TO THICKEN THE JUICES.

PUT ALL INGREDIENTS INTO A CROCK POT AND COOK ON HIGH FOR APPROXIMATELY 8 HOURS. ALTERNATELY, BEANS CAN BE COOKED IN A PRESSURE COOKER AT 15# FOR 1 HOUR.

DEPENDING ON THE USE YOU MAY OR MAY NOT WANT TO MASH THE BEANS. THE EASIEST WAY TO MASH THEM IS WITH AN ELECTRIC MIXER. MAKE SURE YOU DRAIN SOME JUICE OFF PRIOR TO MIXING OR THEY WILL BE TOO THIN.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

News from the front....The flu is never CONVENIENT.... nevertheless...

At least it waited until after the recording session. *whew*
Seriously, I am wondering if there will be anything left of me once I get done coughing, or if I will simply become like an old t-shirt, turned inside out, laying in a sad little heap on the floor.
LOL

But seriously...
The recording session for "Pursuit*" went phenomenally smooth. I do believe Steve Avedis ("Uncle Steve") has really developed an intuitive 'feel' for this band. He has an uncanny ability to zero in on exactly where we are headed with a song, and bring it to life. And he comes up with the coolest suggestions - many times, it's like he's reading our minds.
ooOOoo...
It's like magic.
*Pursuit is an epic tale of a pirate ship from hell - of course! Is there any other kind?
The song has become everything I had envisioned when the initial strains of music first came to me - illuminated by Scotte's incredibly vivid, picturesque lyrics, and brought to life by JJ's inimitable voice.


The party at JJ's sister's house (HOUSE? More like a hotel/ranch/private resort!!!) was a blast, and the people were great.
We need to play more places that have a rope swing.
:)

In other news, I have gone 'back to school' and joined an online art academy, where I am honing my knowledge and skills, ready to elevate my artwork to a new level. It's very exciting.
You can follow that on my art blog by clicking HERE, or go to:
http://mikeyzart.blogspot.com/
But be sure to come back here when you're done!

Cheers-
Mikey